<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/33102987?origin\x3dhttps://lesanndeville.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Name that Baby



Ok folks, time for a vote. There are varying opinions regarding whether the girls look alike. A photo of each to see if you can tell which girl is Maude, which is Margo:

Photo A:





Photo B:
Any takers?
- Donna

This entry was posted on Saturday, November 01, 2008 at 3:47 p.m.. You can skip to the end and leave a response.

« Home | Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »
| Next »

6:28 p.m. Anonymous Anonymous said…


HAHA Are you freakin' kidding me??? They are identical. Except... I know the second one is Margo, so the first must be Maude. Awesome idea, you will have to keep it going..    



9:45 p.m. Anonymous Anonymous said…


I can't remember what my previous position was, but now it is obvious, a is Maude, b is Margo. Is this when I eat my words??    



10:27 p.m. Blogger Soha said…


yep - the first pic is Maude and the second is Margo - but they do look very alike. Both are also very sweet pictures! :)    



8:55 a.m. Blogger accidental altruist said…


I'm with Soha. The top pic is Maude and the bottom is Margo. BOTH are adorable and VERY similar looking!    



9:15 a.m. Blogger Donna said…


I'll let a few more weigh in before I reveal the truth . . .    



11:48 a.m. Anonymous Anonymous said…


Oh my god!!! Okay I know what I said but I was wrong. So, Baby A is Maude and B is Margo. I can't believe how wrong I was before!!

Love, Auntie Laurie    



1:35 p.m. Blogger Emily said…


Maude is photo A, Margo photo B - hands down.

-Em    



6:01 p.m. Blogger Donna said…


Ok. Maybe they don't look as similar as I had thought . .although I can tell them apart easily enough in photos (I AM their mama, after all!) - I'm surprised that as many of you can, too. Indeed, Maude is baby A, and Margo is baby B. And lisa - your previous postion is that the girls do NOT look alike - so no need to eat those words . . .and Auntie Laurie - I don't remember what your stance was before -- I just remember that you thought Maude looked a lot like me as a baby. I still think that's true!    



7:10 p.m. Anonymous Anonymous said…


Ah, but can you tell what they're thinking in each photo?

- Michel    



2:31 p.m. Blogger Holly said…


I'm totally late on this one but I would have said Maude on top, Margo on bottom too. They definitely look alike but not identical; ideal for sisters, no? Both cuties.    



2:32 p.m. Anonymous Anonymous said…


I'm totally late on this one but I would have said Maude on top, Margo on bottom too. They definitely look alike but not identical; ideal for sisters, no? Both cuties.    



2:32 p.m. Blogger Holly said…


I'm totally late on this one but I would have said Maude on top, Margo on bottom too. They definitely look alike but not identical; ideal for sisters, no? Both cuties.    



3:03 p.m. Anonymous Anonymous said…


The only difference I can see is in their eyes and if it weren't for that, they'd be twins. Well, that and a couple of years...but who's really counting?    



» Post a Comment